top of page
2025年第三届财务管理与数字经济国际学术会议_画板 1 副本 3.png

ABOUT ICFMDE 2025

The 2025 3rd International Conference on Financial Management and the Digital Economy (ICFMDE 2025) is set to be an event that brings together a diverse array of experts, practitioners, and thought leaders in the realms of financial management and the digital economy. With the rapid integration of digital technologies into the financial sector, this conference will provide a dynamic platform to delve into the intersections of finance and technology.

Participants can look forward to a rich tapestry of discussions spanning various subfields, including but not limited to fintech, blockchain applications, digital banking, algorithmic trading, risk management in the digital age, and data-driven decision-making in financial contexts. The conference will host renowned keynote speakers who will share their perspectives on the evolving landscape, shedding light on emerging paradigms and strategies.

One of the conference's core objectives is to bridge the gap between theoretical insights and practical implications. Sessions will not only emphasize theoretical advancements but also spotlight case studies and real-world implementations, offering attendees valuable takeaways that can be directly applied in their professional endeavors. 

The ICFMDE 2025 promises to be an intellectually stimulating and practically enriching experience, contributing to the advancement of both financial management and the digital economy on a global scale.

Call for Papers

The purpose of ICFMDE 2025 is to provide a common forum for researchers, scientists, and students from all over the world to present their latest research findings, ideas and developments in the areas of financial management and digital economy. 

Publication

Accepted papers will be included and published in the Atlantis Press, which will be indexed in a number of services, including these leading databases: *Scopus, 

*CPCI (subject to acceptance)
*CNKI
*Wanfang Data
*Google Scholar
*CrossRef

Download

Conference Proceedings uses author-prepared PDFs for publication.

It is important to ensure that your paper complies with the template format.​

Reviewing Process Overview

The proceeding adheres to a rigorous, double-blind peer review process to ensure academic quality and ethical standards. Key steps are outlined below:

  1. Manuscript Allocation: Within one week after submission, the Editor-in-Chief assigns each manuscript to 2–3 independent reviewers with expertise aligned to the paper’s topic. Reviewers must declare no conflicts of interest (e.g., collaborations, institutional affiliations, or financial ties with authors) prior to participation.

  2. Initial Screening (1 week): Reviewers conduct a preliminary check for compliance with formatting guidelines, structural completeness (abstract, methods, results, etc.), and thematic relevance. Manuscripts failing to meet basic standards are desk-rejected, with detailed feedback provided to authors.

  3. In-Depth Evaluation (3 weeks): Reviewers assess the manuscript’s originality, methodological validity, data integrity, and contribution to the field. Evaluations include:

    • A categorical rating (Accept/Minor Revision/Major Revision/Reject)

    • Constructive comments for improvement

    • A confidential recommendation to the Editor

  4. Decision-Making & Conflict Resolution: The Editor consolidates reviews and resolves discrepancies through panel discussions. Final decisions prioritize both scholarly rigor and a target acceptance rate of [40%], which balances selectivity with support for emerging research. Borderline manuscripts may undergo additional review or statistical validation.

  5. Author Notification: Authors receive a decision within 1-week post-review, including anonymized reviewer comments. Accepted manuscripts proceed to production; others may be invited to resubmit after revision (2-month revision window).

  6. Revisions & Appeals: Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated within 2 weeks. Authors may appeal decisions with a point-by-point rebuttal, which triggers an independent audit by the Editorial Board.

Sponsor

浙江工商大学杭州商学院logo(1)-02.png
bottom of page